Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Antonia Schmidt vs Destanee Aiava Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Schmidt vs Aiava analysis and find out who is favored!
Antonia Schmidt vs Destanee Aiava Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Schmidt 1 - 0 Aiava
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Schmidt has won 47.9% of points on his second serve, while Aiava has won 49.74%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Schmidt, in recent form, has won 56.99% of his opponent's second serve points, while Aiava has won 53.7%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.43% and 38.16% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Schmidt has saved 55.56% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Aiava has saved 56.52% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Schmidt has won 61.29% of matches played (W/L 38/ 24), with Aiava winning 66.67% (W/L 52/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Schmidt has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 34/ 26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Aiava has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 46/ 27), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Schmidt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55% of matches (W/L 22/ 18), where as Aiava has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.57% of matches (W/L 50/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Schmidt winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Schmidt winning 2 and Aiava winning 1. The last match between Schmidt and Aiava was at the W35 Bastad, 09-05-2024, Second, Clay with Antonia Schmidt getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:31:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Schmidt and Aiava have played a deciding set 1 times, with Schmidt winning 1 times and Aiava 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Schmidt winning 0, and Aiava 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Schmidt has played against opponents with an average rank of 255.37 while Aiava has played against players with an average rank of 244.27.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Schmidt has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Aiava has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Schmidt has converted 46.98% of breakpoint opportunities, and Aiava has converted 48.02% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
523
Rank
523
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
191
Rank
147
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
56% (130-103)
Career Total W/L
61% (220-143)
64% (18-10)
YTD W/L
58% (15-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$127,649
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Antonia Schmidt | Destanee Aiava |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:31:0 | 2:31:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (71/100) | 59% (55/93) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (41/71) | 58% (32/55) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (13/29) | 34% (13/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 32% (7/22) | 40% (6/15) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (48/93) | 46% (46/100) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Destanee Aiava
71%
(
71 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
46 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Antonia Schmidt | Destanee Aiava |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (18/10) | 58% (15/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (38/26) | 57% (34/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (311/283) | 52% (290/266) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (12/4) | 61% (14/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.23 |
| Aces Total | 82 | 62 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 96 | 59 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:55 | 1:37:59 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 255.07 | 223.69 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1221/1903) | 64% (1164/1820) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (798/1221) | 63% (738/1164) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (315/682) | 50% (328/656) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (109/224) | 49% (92/186) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (849/1916) | 43% (740/1732) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 61% (11/7) | 59% (13/9) |
| Futures W/L | 70% (7/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (18/28) | 58% (15/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (6/8) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (16/15) | 79% (14/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (16/1) | 21% (14/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 33% (12/4) |
Antonia Schmidt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nellie Taraba Wallberg
Player
Antonia Schmidt
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Destanee Aiava
71%
(
71 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
46 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Isabel Skoog
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
1
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
7
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Antonia Schmidt
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Malene Helgo
Player
Antonia Schmidt
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Nina Vargova
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Julia Middendorf
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
46%
(
16 of
35)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Antonia Schmidt
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Emeline Dartron
48%
(
38 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
1-6 7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Margaux Rouvroy
Player
Antonia Schmidt
79%
(
84 of
107)
1st Serve %
66%
(
93 of
140)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
50 of
93)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
42%
(
45 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
66 of
140)
128
Total Points Won
119
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Destanee Aiava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Irina Maria Bara
Player
Destanee Aiava
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Destanee Aiava
71%
(
71 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
46 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
96)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
85
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stacey Fung
Player
Destanee Aiava
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Haruka Kaji
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
79%
(
38 of
48)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Yuki Naito
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Naho Sato
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
91)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Destanee Aiava
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Hanna Chang
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
108)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
9
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
108)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lanlana Tararudee
Player
Destanee Aiava
44%
(
39 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
59%
(
29 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Schmidt Vs Aiava Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
